Latest court orders, judgments, and legal developments from Indian courts — AI-curated and summarized.
FeaturedThe Delhi High Court has ruled on personality rights in favor of Aniruddhacharya Ji Maharaj, addressing the murky terrain of IP laws regarding personal likenesses and public commentary. This decision may influence future cases in the sphere of personality rights.
FeaturedThe Supreme Court reaffirmed the constitutional safeguards under Article 20, emphasizing protections against retrospective punishment and double jeopardy.
FeaturedThe Supreme Court ruled that authorities implementing measures against aggressive stray dogs cannot face criminal charges. The ruling allows for euthanisation of rabid or dangerous dogs to protect public safety.
FeaturedThe Kerala High Court has permitted a transgender man to freeze and store his eggs, marking a progressive step for reproductive rights. The ruling challenges previous limitations under the ART Act, 2021.
FeaturedCJI Surya Kant proposed that the judiciary must operate round the clock, akin to hospitals, to better serve the public's needs. This call for modernization emphasizes technological integration in the legal system.
FeaturedThe Supreme Court expressed reservations about its previous ruling denying bail to Umar Khalid, affirming that bail should be the default in UAPA cases. The Court's recent decision grants bail to another accused, potentially shifting the landscape of judicial precedence in similar cases.
FeaturedThe Supreme Court has quashed outdated criminal proceedings and requested data on pending cases in the Allahabad HC, highlighting the need for timely justice.
FeaturedThe Constitution (One Hundred and Sixth Amendment) Act, 2023 introduces a one-third reservation for women in legislative bodies. The article discusses the constitutional basis for this amendment and its implications for women's political participation.
The Madras High Court ruled that confidential Look Out Circulars (LOCs) must be disclosed to affected individuals, reinforcing their constitutional rights. This decision emphasizes the need for transparency and compliance in legal procedures involving LOCs.
The SAFEMA Tribunal has set aside a PMLA attachment worth ₹161.22 Crore after determining that the underlying scheduled offences were quashed or judicially interfered with. This ruling highlights the necessity of a predicate offence for imposing PMLA attachments.
Justice Ujjal Bhuyan has raised concerns about the lack of distinguished jurists appointed to the Supreme Court, noting that the relevant constitutional provision has been unused for 76 years.
Ex-Madras High Court Justice V Sivagnanam is untraceable in Nepal following severe floods. The Delhi Tamil Advocates Association has called for intervention by the Chief Justice of India to locate him.