AI-curated court updates, legal developments, and practice-area insights for Indian legal professionals.
The Reserve Bank of India has published comprehensive data on Overseas Direct Investment for June 2026, detailing investment flows and regulatory actions.
The CDSCO invites comments on the use of brand name extensions by pharmaceutical companies amidst concerns of misleading practices.
The SpicyIP Weekly Review summarizes significant developments in IP law, including the Bombay High Court ruling on Black Diamond Motors.
The Karnataka High Court has permitted a delayed appeal against GST orders to be heard on its merits, directing authorities to entertain the appeal despite limitation objections.
The Bombay High Court ruled that anticipatory bail could not be granted in GST-related cases unless there is an existing Section 69 arrest order. The ruling highlights procedural requirements for arrests under GST.
The Madras High Court has ruled that Input Tax Credit (ITC) cannot be denied solely because the supplier is later declared non-existent. The ruling stresses the need for thorough examination of documentary evidence.
The Orissa High Court has set aside a GST appellate order that incorrectly categorized interest as tax, leading to a wrongful pre-deposit requirement under Section 112. This case highlights the importance of accurate documentation in GST assessments.
The Bombay High Court has quashed an ex parte GST order as it was uploaded in the incorrect portal section, denying the taxpayer a chance to respond. This ruling underscores the importance of proper procedural adherence in tax-related matters.
The Chhattisgarh High Court has allowed a state tax officer to claim retrospective seniority along with monetary benefits. The authorities are directed to resolve the officer's representation within 120 days.
The Karnataka High Court remanded PMLA attachment proceedings after determining that the petitioner's objections were not adequately addressed by the Adjudicating Authority. This ruling emphasizes the necessity for authorities to consider all submissions during proceedings.
The Calcutta High Court set aside a recovery decree issued during the IBC Section 96 interim moratorium, holding the suit was barred under Section 96(1)(b)(ii). This reinforces the protective nature of the moratorium against creditor actions.
The NCLAT mandated the preparation of a Resolution Plan addendum to address homebuyers' claims prior to NCLT approval. This decision safeguards homebuyers' interests during insolvency resolution processes.
The Supreme Court upheld the condonation of a delay in filing a second appeal while imposing a cost of ₹50,000 on the state. This ruling allows for expeditious disposal of pending appeals.