Adult Woman Cannot Be Forced to Return Home or Marry: Bombay HC
The Bombay High Court ruled that a 21-year-old woman cannot be compelled to return home or marry against her will, framing residence and marriage as choices under Article 21.
Latest court orders, judgments, and legal developments from Indian courts — AI-curated and summarized.
The Bombay High Court ruled that a 21-year-old woman cannot be compelled to return home or marry against her will, framing residence and marriage as choices under Article 21.

The Madras High Court has issued notices to Tamil Nadu Chief Minister C Joseph Vijay and Minister Aadhav Arjuna regarding petitions challenging their recent election wins. The court has also allowed time to rectify defects in some petitions.
The Supreme Court ruled that hotel booking records and call detail records can be summoned to prove adultery in matrimonial disputes without violating privacy rights. This ruling underscores the necessity of such evidence for fair matrimonial proceedings.

The Gauhati High Court ruled that PAN Card and EPIC are insufficient as proof of citizenship in Foreigners Tribunal cases without reliable supporting documents.
The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of a writ petition, citing significant delay in filing without adequate explanation, thereby reinforcing the importance of timely appeals.
The Gauhati High Court annulled a GST registration cancellation order, noting the absence of a reasoned decision. The court emphasized the need for accountability in authority actions.

The Karnataka High Court has upheld the criminal proceedings against a travel agent involved in renewing a passport for an alleged terrorist. The judgment emphasizes the seriousness of aiding terrorism.

The Karnataka High Court expressed that the involvement of politicians and public servants in heinous crimes is rare. This statement came during the hearing of an appeal by former MLA Vinay Kulkarni against his life sentence for the murder of BJP leader Yogesh Gowda.
The Delhi High Court upheld a nationwide temporary ban on the Telegram platform, highlighting the implications of platform architecture on regulation. This ruling reflects a shift towards recognizing 'architectural liability' in public law contexts.
The Delhi High Court upheld the temporary blocking of Telegram, citing architectural liability and its implications for public law. The court's decision signals a potential shift in how digital platforms may be regulated under existing laws.

The Karnataka High Court has quashed an order to return nine dogs to their owner accused of cruelty, emphasizing animal rights as integral to constitutional morality.

The Karnataka High Court upheld the Karnataka Information Commission's disciplinary actions against BDA Secretary Shivakumar CL, stressing the importance of accountability in public administration.