Latest court orders, judgments, and legal developments from Indian courts — AI-curated and summarized.
The Calcutta High Court dismissed a plea from National Insurance based on outdated information and enhanced compensation under the MACT, solidifying the standard that suspicion cannot replace actual proof.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi has proposed the establishment of fast-track courts to expedite trials related to examination paper leaks, ensuring swift justice. This move is aimed at reinforcing the integrity of examination processes.
The Delhi High Court has agreed to urgently hear a PIL seeking an NIA investigation into the recent Cockroach Janta Party protests, which were marked by a march to Parliament. The decision highlights the legal scrutiny surrounding citizen protests.
Lawyers in Delhi and Mumbai have condemned police violence against students protesting over examination paper leaks, describing the actions as an infringement of constitutional rights. They demand accountability for police excesses during peaceful assemblies.
The Allahabad High Court has directed police to provide security to three advocates in Lucknow following allegations of violence and harassment by colleagues in the district court.
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) Delhi upheld the legality of SARFAESI actions, ruling that a matrimonial dispute cannot prevent such recoveries related to mortgaged properties.
The Calcutta High Court has authorized a borrower to file a new complaint with the RBI Ombudsman regarding the undervalued auction of his truck. The court mandated that the complaint be addressed within six weeks.
The Chhattisgarh High Court has allowed a state tax officer to claim retrospective seniority along with monetary benefits. The authorities are directed to resolve the officer's representation within 120 days.
The Supreme Court upheld the condonation of a delay in filing a second appeal while imposing a cost of ₹50,000 on the state. This ruling allows for expeditious disposal of pending appeals.
The Karnataka High Court has refused specific performance of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) while permitting the developer to amend the plaint and seek a ₹117 Crore compensation. This ruling emphasizes the court's approach to contractual obligations in development agreements.
The Supreme Court ruled that the right to seek probate is a continuing right and found the applicant's petition within limitation, restoring it to the Civil Court. This provides important guidance on probate applications and their timeliness.
In a significant procedural order, the Calcutta High Court has directed the transfer of Rs. 1.38 Crores to a one-man committee while the main Tower Infotech case awaits further hearing.