Latest court orders, judgments, and legal developments from Indian courts — AI-curated and summarized.
The Reserve Bank of India has announced the final redemption details for the Sovereign Gold Bond 2018-19 Series-I scheme, effective May 4, 2026.
SEBI clarified that invoking pledged shares for Employee Stock Option Plans (ESOP) during a closure period may be considered valid, aligning it with regular trading transactions.
With the GARUDA mechanism, SEBI aims to streamline AIF scheme launches, reducing timelines significantly to improve the ease of doing business while maintaining oversight.
SEBI's proposal aims to transition agricultural derivatives to physical settlement through objective triggers, aspiring to enhance transparency and market integrity.
In response to concerns about excessive penalties, SEBI has proposed a cap on fines for breaches of position limits in commodity derivatives trading.
This article evaluates regulatory concerns surrounding the redistribution of privately placed Non-Convertible Debentures (NCDs) via Online Bond Platform Providers (OBPP), highlighting risks for investors.
The proposal by SEBI allows mutual funds to utilize intraday borrowings for a broader range of liquidity management purposes, extending beyond traditional redemption needs.
SEBI mandates detailed disclosures on the websites of listed companies as per LODR Regulations, 2015. The regulations cover financial information, governance practices, and investor communications.
The NCLT Mumbai ruled that a director diverted rental income through forged agreements. The Tribunal mandated a refund with interest and referred the case to the IBBI.
The Registrar of Companies in Chennai penalized a company and its director for a significant delay in filing Form MGT-7, emphasizing that such lapses attract substantial penalties.
The Registrar of Companies emphasized that Section 155 strictly prohibits holding multiple Director Identification Numbers (DINs). Penalties were enforced despite the subsequent surrender of the duplicate DIN via DIR-5.
The Calcutta High Court has upheld the jurisdiction of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) to revise 'unallocated' head office expenses within tax holiday units, ensuring the integrity of tax assessments.