
Filing Error Does Not Void Section 10AA Deduction
ITAT has ruled that an incorrect form filing does not negate entitlement to Section 10AA deductions if eligibility criteria are met.
Latest court orders, judgments, and legal developments from Indian courts — AI-curated and summarized.

ITAT has ruled that an incorrect form filing does not negate entitlement to Section 10AA deductions if eligibility criteria are met.

The Karnataka High Court dismissed an excise demand citing lack of scientific basis, confirming that clandestine removal of goods cannot be established by mere power consumption analysis.

The CESTAT ruled that voyage charter contracts for coastal goods are categorized as transportation services rather than tangible goods supply, impacting taxation perspectives.

The ITAT has deleted a concealment penalty related to capital gains on a development agreement, finding the taxability issue debatable. This decision highlights the importance of judicial interpretation in tax assessments.

The ITAT ruled that the Revenue was unable to prove the taxpayer's ownership of the property, resulting in the deletion of capital gain additions. This decision highlights the burden of proof on the tax authorities.
The Reserve Bank of India has announced an auction of state government securities amounting to ₹13,600 Crore. The details of the offerings and their terms are crucial for potential investors.
ITAT quashes a Section 263 revision order, reinforcing that adequate inquiries by the AO cannot be overruled based on mere preferences for additional verification.
The Pune ITAT dismissed a ₹10 lakh addition, ruling that unsubstantiated cash payment claims cannot outweigh documented banking transactions.
An overview of the abolition of angel tax for certain taxpayers and ongoing scrutiny under Section 56(2)(viib) for the assessment year 2026-27.
A comprehensive guide for NRIs on compliance surrounding Indian income tax, detailing taxable income and obligations related to ITR filing.
This article examines whether a tax audit is mandatory under Section 58(3) of the Income-tax Act when profits fall below 6%, emphasizing the need for legislative clarification.

The ITAT has ruled that a Chartered Accountant (CA) acting as a conduit for client tax payments cannot be taxed on funds deposited through their bank account as unexplained income.