Latest court orders, judgments, and legal developments from Indian courts — AI-curated and summarized.
The NCLT has ordered the liquidation of a corporate debtor following the rejection of its only resolution plan by the Committee of Creditors (CoC). This ruling outlines the procedure in case of plan rejections.
The NCLAT has upheld the admission of insolvency by emphasizing that operational debts cannot be offset by pre-existing disputes over supply delays or defects. The ruling clarifies the applicability of the IBC regarding admitted debts.
The NCLT Principal Bench has ordered the dissolution of AVJ Infrastructure following the completion of its liquidation process. This ruling confirms the eligibility for dissolution under Section 54 of the IBC.
The NCLT Principal Bench has permitted the dissolution of a corporate debtor after the assignment of avoidance proceedings and remaining assets during the liquidation process. This ruling highlights the conditions under which dissolution can be deemed valid.
The Bombay High Court emphasized the need for timely decisions in insolvency cases, directing NCLT to expedite JM Financial's ₹167 crore plea. The court's order underlines that delays undermine the purpose of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC).
The NCLAT has rejected Vedanta’s ₹17,926 crore resolution plan, affirming that the Committee of Creditors (CoC) may prioritize feasibility over the highest net present value. This decision underscores the CoC's authority in determining the most suitable resolution.
The Bombay High Court has emphasized the need for timely delivery of reserved orders in insolvency cases, directing the NCLT to expedite JM Financial’s ₹167 crore insolvency plea. This ruling highlights the court's commitment to uphold the integrity of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC).
The NCLT admitted insolvency proceedings after evidence of operational debt and acknowledgment of liability was presented, highlighting the standard of proof required in insolvency applications.
NCLAT ruled that challenges regarding an approved resolution plan could not be reopened as they had already attained finality, reinforcing the principle of finality in insolvency proceedings.
The NCLAT declared the appointment of a Resolution Professional invalid due to misrepresentation, highlighting the importance of accurate representation in insolvency applications.
The NCLT has approved a ₹17.25 crore resolution plan, stating that statutory obligations cannot be waived due to COVID-19-related disturbances. This ruling addresses the challenges during CIRP amid financial uncertainties.
The NSE clarified that regulatory exemptions applicable to IBC Section 31 resolution plans do not extend to plans approved under Section 54L in the PPIRP framework, necessitating compliance with SEBI requirements.