Latest court orders, judgments, and legal developments from Indian courts — AI-curated and summarized.
The Delhi High Court ruled in favor of Anil Kumar Tiwari, highlighting the complexities of personality rights jurisprudence in India. This ruling raises critical questions about the interplay between social commentary, intellectual property rights, and public discourse.
In a recent ruling, the Delhi High Court addressed complexities related to Section 3(k) of the Patents Act, revealing the ongoing confusion and need for clarity in patentability standards.
Zee Entertainment has approached the Delhi High Court seeking damages amounting to INR 2 crores from Nykaa for alleged copyright infringement involving Instagram reels. This case highlights ongoing legal battles regarding music rights in digital media.
The Delhi High Court has dismissed Philips' claim for royalties on DVD technology, ruling that mere assertion of essentiality is insufficient without evidence of use.
The Delhi High Court has ruled that Ilaiyaraaja does not hold copyright over the song En Iniya Pon Nilave's lyrics or sound recording, affecting his appeal against a recreation of the song for a film.
Zee Entertainment has filed a lawsuit against Nykaa, seeking INR 2 crores for alleged unauthorized use of its copyrighted music in Instagram reels. The case underscores ongoing challenges in copyright enforcement in the digital era.
Zee Entertainment has approached the Delhi High Court seeking INR 2 crores in damages from Nykaa for the unauthorized use of copyrighted songs in social media marketing.
Zee Entertainment files a lawsuit against Nykaa, claiming INR 2 crores for unauthorized use of copyrighted music in Instagram reels.
The Delhi High Court has officially declared GSK's CALPOL as a well-known trademark amid a trademark infringement suit. This recognition acknowledges the brand's reputation and protects it from unauthorized use.
The Delhi High Court's recent pro-tem order in the Malikie v. Xiaomi case signifies ongoing challenges in determining fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms for standard essential patents (SEPs).
The Calcutta High Court has upheld the economic rights of authors over their works in a recent ruling, emphasizing the intent behind the copyright amendments of 2012.
The Delhi High Court addressed the complexities surrounding Section 3(k) of the Indian Patents Act in the case Blackberry v. Controller. Despite previous guidelines, the interpretation of patentability remains unclear.