Latest court orders, judgments, and legal developments from Indian courts — AI-curated and summarized.
FeaturedThe Madras High Court condemned the creation of morphed obscene images of women, stating it constitutes a significant violation of privacy and dignity and mandated police action.
FeaturedSEBI explores regulatory measures for AI-driven investment advice, emphasizing continued responsibility for registered advisers for AI-generated recommendations.
FeaturedThe Reserve Bank of India has communicated essential updates regarding the implementation of Section 51A of the UAPA, 1967, in light of changes to the UNSC Sanctions List, affecting various financial institutions.
FeaturedThe Delhi High Court has ordered the Registrar of Copyright to consider a bid for registering fully AI-generated artwork, raising significant questions about authorship under the Copyright Act.
RBI circular alerts financial institutions to a new terrorist organisation designated under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, mandating compliance with asset-freezing obligations.
The Delhi High Court offers insights on navigating jurisdictional issues within the digital realm in Hindustan Unilever Limited v Kwick Living.
The Delhi High Court scrutinizes the automated copyright take-down processes employed by social media platforms, raising concerns over free speech implications and copyright enforcement mechanisms.
SEBI has aligned its cyber incident reporting portal with the Financial Stability Board's FIRE format, requiring structured reporting from regulated entities to strengthen cybersecurity practices.
SEBI has restructured its cyber incident reporting portal to adhere to the Financial Stability Board's (FSB) Framework for Improving Cyber Resilience (FIRE), mandating a structured and systematic approach for regulated entities.
The article discusses India's ongoing intermediate liability framework and the recent challenges posed by copyright enforcement. The Delhi High Court has sought clarity on these matters from Meta, marking a pivotal moment in digital copyright law.
The Delhi High Court's decision in Home Box Office Inc. v. Streamzy.To addresses the balance between combating online piracy and the limitations of website blocking under Section 79 of the IT Act. The ruling seeks to define the role of intermediaries more clearly.
The Delhi High Court's ruling in *Home Box Office Inc. v. Streamzy.To* provides insights into the dynamics of injunctions and web blocking, framing the ongoing legal discourse on copyright and digital rights.