Latest court orders, judgments, and legal developments from Indian courts — AI-curated and summarized.
The Jammu & Kashmir High Court ruled that recovery from a retired employee's dues was unlawful in the absence of fraud or misrepresentation. Authorities can revise pension calculations but cannot recover excess amounts.
The Supreme Court established two additional election tribunals to address disputes from ongoing State Bar Council elections, enhancing the resolution mechanisms available for legal practitioners.
The Madras High Court restored a writ petition concerning the EPF Board's decision in the Poppys Knitwear case, setting aside the single-judge dismissal and allowing for adjudication on merits. This decision opens the door for further legal challenge against the tribunal's reversal.
The Gujarat High Court has ruled that an organizational head cannot be charged with abetment in sexual harassment cases solely for disregarding complaints. This decision quashes criminal proceedings against former FIA President Kanaiyalal Trikamlal Patel.
The article outlines the principles of natural justice as they apply to inquiries under the POSH Act. The focus is on ensuring fair processes in addressing sexual harassment complaints.
The Supreme Court ruled that an employee who accepted CPF benefits cannot subsequently claim a GPF pension after retirement, reinforcing the binding nature of prior acceptance.
The Bombay High Court has set aside an appellate tribunal's order, confirming that TDS under Section 194A does not apply to interest payments made by cooperative banks to non-member cooperative societies.
The Calcutta High Court has affirmed equal pay for equal work, granting pay parity to municipal tax collectors based on the administration's own admission.
The Karnataka High Court has directed the EPFO to pursue its provident fund dues claim before the NCLT in liquidation proceedings, dismissing the writ case.
Recent comments submitted to the CDSCO highlight ongoing issues with brand name extension practices in India. The discourse around these policies has seen limited public engagement, which raises significant concerns.
The Chhattisgarh High Court has allowed a state tax officer to submit a representation for retrospective seniority and associated monetary benefits. The court directed the authorities to resolve this representation within 120 days.
The Calcutta High Court ruled that the Employees' Provident Fund Organization (EPFO) cannot impose penalties on employers for delays stemming from court-approved payment schedules. The bench characterized such penalties as 'interest on interest', asserting the need to respect judicial orders.