Latest court orders, judgments, and legal developments from Indian courts — AI-curated and summarized.
The RBI has directed regulated entities to implement updates to the UNSC 1267/1989 ISIL and Al-Qaida Sanctions List following amendments to individual entries. Compliance is mandated under UAPA, 1967.
The Reserve Bank of India has issued a notification regarding an amendment to one entry in the UNSC 1988 (2011) Taliban Sanctions List. Regulated entities must ensure strict compliance with these updated sanctions procedures under UAPA, 1967.
The Allahabad High Court has granted bail to Waseem Akram in a GST fraud case, noting the applicant was not implicated in the FIR.
The Supreme Court raised concerns over the Andhra Pradesh High Court's practice of listing cases under 'For Dismissal,' emphasizing the potential impact on fair trial rights.
The SAFEMA Tribunal upheld a ₹8.28 lakh PMLA attachment, determining that merely claiming victimhood without supporting bank statements is insufficient to challenge the attachment.
Karnataka Home Minister Priyank Kharge and Mohammed Nalapad were granted bail by a Bengaluru court in a defamation complaint against RSS. The court classified the alleged offence as bailable.
The Jammu and Kashmir High Court has ruled that cheque bounce complaints cannot be quashed midway when there are disputed facts, affirming the necessity for a trial to resolve such issues.
The Gauhati High Court has granted conditional bail to a woman involved in a GST evasion case, requiring her cooperation with the ongoing investigation.
In a ruling by the SAFEMA Tribunal, a PMLA attachment of ₹8.28 lakh was upheld, as the appellant failed to provide necessary bank statements to substantiate claims of being a victim.
The Orissa High Court has quashed a non-bailable warrant (NBW) issued against an accused in a PMLA case, establishing that summons or bailable warrants must precede an NBW. This ruling clarifies procedural fairness in PMLA trials.
The Gauhati High Court has ruled that a regular criminal court does not have the authority to order the release of goods seized under the Customs Act, specifically under Section 110A.
The Delhi High Court has dismissed a writ petition challenging the Enforcement Directorate's attachment of ₹18.10 crores under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. The court emphasized the availability of statutory remedies to the petitioner.