Latest court orders, judgments, and legal developments from Indian courts — AI-curated and summarized.
In KVIC v. Jaishukh N. Bhuta, the Bombay High Court ruled that not every willful breach of an interim injunction warrants punishment, emphasizing the distinction between disobedience and the consequences under Order XXXIX Rule 2A.
In a ruling by the SAFEMA Tribunal, a PMLA attachment of ₹8.28 lakh was upheld, as the appellant failed to provide necessary bank statements to substantiate claims of being a victim.
The Orissa High Court has quashed a non-bailable warrant (NBW) issued against an accused in a PMLA case, establishing that summons or bailable warrants must precede an NBW. This ruling clarifies procedural fairness in PMLA trials.
Clarification has been issued regarding the tax implications and FEMA regulations concerning money remitted from children living abroad, including ITR reporting and documentation requirements.
The Calcutta High Court dismissed a petition challenging police actions over loudspeakers at mosques due to insufficient evidence. The ruling underscores the importance of proper documentation in such legal claims.
The Uttar Pradesh government has rebutted Rahul Gandhi’s plea in the Supreme Court to quash a summons issued for his remarks about Vinayak Savarkar, citing concerns of inciting hatred.
The Supreme Court has stayed criminal defamation proceedings against Rahul Gandhi regarding his comments about the Indian Army, questioning the relevance of social media commentary in judicial matters.
NALSAR University will consult its Executive Council on the BCI's demand for an inquiry into the objections raised about CJI attendance at their convocation, after previous BCI circulars.
The BCI chairman announced the closure of proceedings against NALSAR students regarding complaints against CJI attendance at their convocation, following backlash from senior advocates.
The Supreme Court of India refused to initiate suo motu proceedings concerning remarks made by MP Nagendra Ray about Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose. The court directed interested parties to file a formal petition instead.
The article discusses whether a deed can be challenged under the writ jurisdiction of High Courts. This issue raises critical considerations in property law and constitutional jurisprudence.
The CBDT has granted income tax exemption for FY 2026-27 to the District Legal Services Authority on grants, donations, fees, and interest income. This exemption is conditional on adherence to restrictions concerning non-commercial activities and the requirement to file returns under Section 263(9)(c)(xiii).