Latest court orders, judgments, and legal developments from Indian courts — AI-curated and summarized.
IIFL Finance Limited has been penalized ₹3.10 lakh by the RBI for non-compliance with its regulatory framework related to non-banking financial companies. This serves as a reminder of the need for strict adherence to regulations.
The Reserve Bank of India imposed a monetary penalty of ₹5.80 lakh on Appnit Technologies for failure to comply with KYC and PPI directions. This enforcement action highlights the importance of adherence to regulations.
Insights from the University of Geneva’s 2026 IP Conference reflect the growing complexities of copyright enforcement in the gaming industry. The discussions highlight the need for adaptive legal strategies in response to the evolving IP landscape.
The Delhi High Court is adjudicating a case where Zee Entertainment seeks INR 2 crores from Nykaa for alleged copyright infringement involving Instagram reels. This case highlights ongoing issues surrounding copyright enforcement in the digital landscape.
The CESTAT Ahmedabad ruled that imposing a separate penalty on a partner after penalizing the partnership firm is not permissible in Customs law due to lack of specific statutory provision.
The CBIC has revised customs tariff values for gold, silver, and edible oils effective May 16, 2026. Importers need to adjust to these changes for proper compliance in customs valuation.
The CESTAT Mumbai ruled that mandarin juice concentrate is correctly classified under a different category than orange juice, substantiating duty demands while quashing penalties. This decision clarifies tariff classifications for citrus products.
The CESTAT Bangalore ruled that an automatic soap dispenser cannot be classified as a toiletry spray since it only dispenses foam. Instead, it falls under the category of dispersing appliances, specifically under CTI 8424 89 90.
The Calcutta High Court ruled that a motor vehicle tax demand is invalid if the corresponding permit was not duly countersigned. This decision clarifies tax liabilities associated with inter-state permits.
In a significant ruling, the J&K and Ladakh High Court quashed the recovery of excess salary from a retired employee's pension, concluding that re-fixation of pension is permissible only if his promotion was ratified.
The Gauhati High Court determined that the CBIC Chairman and Customs Commissioners are necessary parties in a writ petition. This ruling clarifies the procedural requirements for effective legal redress in customs-related cases.
CJI Surya Kant emphasized the need for the judiciary to function continuously to promptly address citizens' demands. He called for enhanced technological integration in judicial infrastructure to facilitate immediate and accessible justice.