Latest court orders, judgments, and legal developments from Indian courts — AI-curated and summarized.
FeaturedThe NCLT has initiated Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against a corporate debtor, appointing an Interim Resolution Professional and enforcing a moratorium, highlighting the judiciary's stance on insolvency matters.
FeaturedThe NCLAT has confirmed that a Resolution Professional (RP) is authorized to recover assets of a corporate debtor from unauthorized occupants without the need to file a civil suit, streamlining asset recovery under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.
The IBC is challenged by foreign sanctions as Indian insolvency tribunals navigate complex global issues. This situation raises questions about the interplay between insolvency law and international regulatory restrictions.
The NCLT has admitted an insolvency plea by Aditya Birla Finance against a personal guarantor, reinforcing the continuing guarantee that keeps liability alive beyond liquidation. A moratorium on recoveries has been imposed.
The NCLT has initiated the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under Section 7 of the IBC for a default amounting to ₹16.53 crores. A moratorium has been declared under Section 14 of the IBC.
The NCLT has initiated a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against a corporate debtor citing financial distress, confirming that such distress does not exempt the company from insolvency proceedings. An Interim Resolution Professional has been appointed.
In a significant ruling, the NCLT has directed Kotak Mahindra Bank to return title deeds owed to a corporate debtor following full payment of the approved resolution plan. This decision reinforces creditors' obligations post-resolution settlement.
The NCLT has admitted an insolvency plea against a kraft paper manufacturer, appointing Rishabh Sethi as the Interim Resolution Professional. This marks a significant step in the corporate insolvency resolution process under Section 9 of the IBC.
SBI's application under Section 7 for insolvency was admitted, asserting that pendency of winding-up proceedings cannot override corporate revival objectives under IBC.
The Supreme Court ruled that a Successful Resolution Applicant (SRA) cannot back out of a CoC-approved resolution plan merely by claiming that the Letter of Intent (LoI) is conditional.
The NCLAT has upheld the eviction of occupants, ruling that unregistered profit-sharing agreements do not create tenancy rights over the assets of a corporate debtor during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP).
The NCLAT has ruled that undisclosed related-party agreements cannot justify the continued occupation of a corporate debtor’s property during CIRP.