The NCLT has admitted a plea from Bank of India for insolvency proceedings worth ₹23.66 crore, ruling that irregularities in NPA classification do not negate an independently established financial default under the IBC.
NCLT on NPA Irregularities and IBC Default
On August 28, 2026, the NCLT accepted an insolvency petition from the Bank of India amounting to ₹23.66 crore, asserting that irregularities in Non-Performing Asset (NPA) classification could not undermine a clear financial default independently established by documentary evidence. The tribunal’s ruling comes amid ongoing debates about the classification and treatment of NPAs in insolvency proceedings.
The NCLT underscored the principle that regardless of classification issues by banks, the actual financial data and obligations of the debtor govern the proceedings triggered under the IBC. The tribunal observed that the legal framework permits a transparent assessment of defaults based on factual financial circumstances rather than mere classifications that may be erroneous.
This ruling reinforces the judicial approach that takes precedence of substantial evidence over procedural discrepancies in classification, thereby ensuring that creditors can pursue their claims without undue hindrance.
Legal practitioners should note this significant ruling as it validates the notion that errors in classification do not mitigate the existence of a default, allowing for the progression of insolvency proceedings and emphasizing the necessity for robust evidence in asserting claims under the IBC.
Citations
- N/A
