The Delhi High Court appointed an amicus curiae to represent Vivek Oberoi’s interests after his counsel withdrew, raising questions about the role of amicus in civil suits pertaining to publicity rights.
Delhi High Court Appoints Amicus Curiae for Vivek Oberoi’s Case
In a recent decision, the Delhi High Court appointed an amicus curiae to represent actor Vivek Oberoi after his legal counsel withdrew from a civil suit concerning the right of publicity. This appointment has sparked debate regarding the appropriate functions and boundaries of an amicus in such contexts.
The principal issue at hand revolves around whether this mechanism serves its intended purpose of aiding the court or inadvertently provides a safety net for parties who choose to disengage from their legal responsibilities. The Court recognized the necessity of representation in matters affecting public interest but also acknowledged the complexities introduced by introducing an amicus at such a stage.
Legal scholars have raised concerns that this practice may undermine the adversarial nature of civil proceedings. The role of an amicus should ideally facilitate informed decision-making by the Court without supplanting the parties’ active participation.
As this case unfolds, practitioners should remain vigilant about the evolving interpretations of the amicus curiae role, especially in civil suits that may set precedents affecting similar future proceedings.
Citations
- Vivek Oberoi Case (2026) Delhi High Court