The Calcutta High Court upheld that civil courts cannot issue injunctions against actions under the SARFAESI Act, reinforcing the legal boundaries of such proceedings.
Calcutta HC Ruling on SARFAESI Measures
The Calcutta High Court has affirmed that civil courts lack the jurisdiction to grant injunctions against actions taken or to be taken by secured creditors under the SARFAESI Act, due to the bar established by Section 34 of the Act. This ruling had implications for the creditor-debtor relationship and the enforcement of financial securities.
The court highlighted that the SARFAESI Act provides a specific regulatory framework for secured creditors, protecting their methods of debt recovery from interference by civil courts. This decision reinforces the statutory mandate of the SARFAESI Act as a pivotal tool for financial institutions.
For legal practitioners in banking and finance, this ruling emphasizes the necessity of navigating the statutory boundaries set by regulatory frameworks. Lawyers must advise clients accordingly on the ramifications of civil court actions in contexts covered by the SARFAESI Act.
Citations
- Calcutta HC Order (2026) 1 SCC 540