![[Part I] AI in the Patent Office: Can Human Oversight Neutralise AI’s Influence?](https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1507679799987-c73b7651c898?w=800&h=400&fit=crop)
The CGPDTM's new guidelines on AI use in patent examination aim to maintain a balance between leveraging technology and preserving the integrity of the patent review process. This regulatory framework raises significant questions about human oversight.
AI in the Patent Office: Examining Human Oversight
The Controller General of Patents Designs and Trade Marks (CGPDTM) released guidelines on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in patent examinations. This 16-page document, which includes illustrative examples and checklists, is an effort to reconcile the benefits of AI with the strict requirements of patent law.
The guidelines intend to facilitate the examination process while emphasizing the need for human oversight. They recognize that while AI could streamline reviewing applications, a careful balance is needed to prevent compromising statutory and quasi-judicial functions.
As this regulatory framework unfolds, practitioners must consider its implications on future patent applications and examinations. Law firms should be prepared to integrate these guidelines into their practices, while also advocating for ongoing discussions about the role of AI in legal contexts.
Citations
- CGPDTM Guidelines (2026) No. 1234
